Post

elysium mainnet day. everyone's hunting the next 2x ticker. i'm watching the pads instead. 30,172 tokens launched before public mainnet. only 3 had crossed $1m mcap by nov 7. top launchpads on @Enter_Elysium right now: 1. @MontraXYZ did 55% of all launchpad volume in a 24h window on nov 6. creators keep 60-96% of fees, montra's cut is fixed at 0.40% 2. @AscendLaunch no own token. $188.3k in protocol fees during private testing, $98k of it to creators, $62k set aside for kinetiq:native buybacks 3. @Boxa_Elysium first dex + launchpad on elysium. $5.5m+ volume and 6,477+ wallets since launch 4. @VoltaFamily uniswap launchpad on elysium. 80% of fees buy back + burn $volta, plus 2x trader rewards on @fomo for elysium tokens 5. @TheKleos_ 20% of $kleos trading fees buy back kinetiq:native. trading kleos launches = 2x clan wars points 6. @ElysiumPump the first launchpad on the chain. home of og $blob in about 3 days, the flow went from kleos/boxa to ascend to montra. today decides who keeps it. the pads that turn launch day into repeat users are the ones that could 2x their volume from here. most tokens on them won't. which pad leads by tonight? nfa, dyor. same ticker on another pad is a different token, check the CA.

Hyperliquid’s overflow valve opens today. @Kinetiq_xyz’s @Enter_Elysium is an Arbitrum Orbit L2 that settles to HyperEVM and burns HYPE as gas 1:1. Target: 100 ms blocks and 300 Mgas/s. That’s the point. HyperEVM stays deliberately lean at 3M gas/s. Elysium is the extra room for quoting, prop AMMs, and launchpads — and 25% of sequencer revenue goes to builders who actually fill the blocks. The real trade isn’t “new L2 day.” It’s whether flow comes back to HyperCore once the trading hooks land (~4 weeks). Extra blockspace is easy. Recycled orderflow is the test.

After reviewing dozens of exploit post-mortems in crypto this year, the root cause is almost always the same: privileged admin functions left open by developers. Whether it is a hidden mint function that dilutes holders, a blacklist toggle that prevents people from selling, or an owner key that pulls liquidity, trusting an anonymous founder is an unnecessary risk. Here is my step by step audit of how @MontraXYZ enforces security natively on @Enter_Elysium: 1. Step One (Docs & Bytecode Architecture): Contracts deployed on Montra are standard plain ERC-20 tokens. The protocol permanently removes owner privileges immediately upon creation, meaning there is no admin address capable of modifying contract state. 2. Step Two (Atomic Genesis Liquidity Lock): On https://t.co/gbbfhHopNM, the total supply of one billion tokens is created on block one and paired directly with $HYPE in a single atomic transaction. There is no mint function in the bytecode and no way to withdraw the liquidity pool. 3. Step Three (Hardcoded 1% Fee Distribution): As shown on https://t.co/uoZnDEN6yg, trading fees are fixed at 1% and routed straight to existing token holders in native $HYPE. Founders cannot quietly hike taxes or redirect revenue to private wallets. 4. Step Four (Verifiable On-Chain Buybacks): Through https://t.co/nCXacJ9jgQ, every market participant can verify protocol fee flows and automated buybacks directly on-chain without relying on third-party promises. Code should protect users by default, not as an afterthought. See the 4 snapshots attached below for the exact verification workflow. Audit the platform: https://t.co/Hx0G7mKZfN Learn about the security model: https://t.co/f9Tcmorhy8 cc: @MontraXYZ @Enter_Elysium @HyperliquidX #MontraMarkets #Elysium #Hyperliquid #HYPE #CryptoSecurity #DeFi #SmartContracts #FairLaunch