Post

He doesn’t miss Elysium , ik $MNTD #gfvip #bbvipks4 #AVFC          #memecoin $COLLECT $CYS $UB $ICNT $PIEVERSE $BULL $TROLL $WCOR $WORLDCUP $AURA $ROYALPOP $BTC $USD #Bitcoin #zelena #Tommavi #helevier #uzaksehir $QQQ $WOJAK $MAGA $BABYTROLL $HANTA $FISH $PBTC $BP $ZBCN $SOL

The second token in today's memecoin recap series is $MONTRA, the official token of launchpad @MontraXYZ Can $MONTRA actually lead this trend? I think that's a question quite a few people are asking right now After following the activity of launchpads on Elysium over the past few days, I think $MONTRA is clearly one of the most interesting tokens to watch right now. However, there's still quite a lot the project needs to prove before it can become a true main runner 1. Narrative – Why Is $MONTRA Attracting So Much Attention? First, let's look at Montra's position within Elysium Before and during the early stages of mainnet, Montra was one of the most active launchpads, at one point accounting for roughly 59–73% of total launchpad trading volume Montra's strength lies in the number of tokens launched and its ability to attract trading activity. However, one issue I've noticed for a while is that Montra has been generating solid volume without producing a truly standout main runner While Ascend has $e/acc and Volta has $VOLTA, most tokens on Montra, such as $EACCAT and $CHAMELEON, haven't managed to generate enough attention or sustain their momentum This is also one of the reasons Montra has been getting quite a bit of FUD lately. Some people argue that the platform is mainly attracting token launches and volume farming rather than creating tokens with genuinely strong communities On top of that, Ascend has been competing aggressively. At one point, Ascend accounted for around 45% of launchpad trading volume, while Montra had dropped to roughly 35% That's why I find the timing of Montra's official token launch pretty interesting Instead of continuing to rely on individual memecoins, Montra now has a token carrying its own brand If Montra can maintain its user base and trading volume, $MONTRA has a real chance of becoming the token that represents the launchpad itself Another factor worth mentioning is Ansem's involvement Recently, @blknoiz06 has been talking quite a bit about Elysium, particularly the opportunities around launchpads leading in trading activity More importantly, Ansem has already taken a position in $MONTRA, making his involvement much more significant than simply showing interest in the ecosystem Given Ansem's influence on CT, this could attract more traders to $MONTRA, especially while the token is still in its early stages However, I don't want to place too much weight on a major KOL buying in. We've seen plenty of tokens pump hard following purchases from big names, only to lose momentum quickly once the FOMO fades My take: $MONTRA has a fairly strong narrative because it's tied to an actual operating product rather than relying entirely on a meme story Ansem buying in adds even more attention. But to lead the entire Elysium ecosystem, having a launchpad brand and KOL support isn't enough. Montra still needs to prove it can retain liquidity and produce genuinely strong runners 2. Dump Risk – Why I'm Still Being Cautious The first thing keeping me from FOMOing into $MONTRA is the overall condition of Elysium After mainnet, the market hasn't really taken off the way many people expected. Tokens like $e/acc, $VOLTA, and several other runners have already experienced significant corrections From what I've observed, most of the liquidity is still rotating between existing tokens and launchpads rather than coming from a strong, consistent inflow of fresh capital into the ecosystem This creates an environment where newly launched tokens can pump aggressively during their first few hours, only to face heavy profit-taking once attention shifts to the next opportunity $MONTRA is no exception Shortly after launch, the token quickly reached a market cap of around $5–6M, accompanied by extremely high trading volume. This clearly shows market interest, but high volume doesn't necessarily mean all of it represents fresh money entering the market Another thing worth mentioning is that the buyback mechanism hasn't been activated yet According to the project's documentation, once buybacks are enabled, 70% of protocol fees will be used to buy back and burn $MONTRA I find this mechanism pretty interesting. However, at this stage, I don't want to price in too much value from a source of buying pressure that hasn't actually materialized yet The 25% supply allocation for airdrops is another factor worth watching Airdrops can help Montra attract users, increase volume, and maintain activity on the platform. But once those tokens are distributed, they could also create selling pressure if most recipients are simply looking to cash out It's worth noting that allocating 25% of supply to an airdrop doesn't mean all those tokens will unlock immediately. The actual distribution schedule is what will determine the impact on price And finally, there's the risk associated with the launchpad business itself If Montra fails to maintain its market share against Ascend or continues struggling to produce quality runners, the narrative supporting $MONTRA could gradually weaken For me, the biggest risk isn't that $MONTRA lacks a story. It's that the market may already be pricing in expectations that haven't been delivered yet 3. The Numbers Worth Paying Attention To Based on the data I recorded from Montra's official website, the latest snapshot shows a total of 20,318 trades, with 961,002 KNTQ in recorded fees Here's the breakdown : > Creator's share : 899,723 KNTQ > Montra protocol : 61,280 KNTQ > Current trading fee : 1% > Outside liquidity : 6.93% > Outside LP positions : 43 > Other pools : 1, accounting for approximately 0.17% of trading volume over the past day In an earlier snapshot, the token also recorded a market cap of around $5.31M, trading volume of $5.48M, and 3,058 holders The first thing that caught my attention was how quickly trading volume surpassed the token's market cap This shows that $MONTRA is attracting significant trading activity, but it also reflects a high level of speculation. With newly launched tokens, I'm usually more interested in whether volume can be sustained after the initial FOMO fades rather than just looking at the early numbers Looking at tokenomics, the initial supply was 4B MONTRA, with 3B burned immediately at launch, representing 75% of the original supply. That leaves 1B MONTRA after the initial burn However, this was a launch-time burn, not tokens bought back using actual revenue. So I wouldn't treat that 75% figure as evidence that the project has already generated real buying pressure What I find more interesting is the fee distribution mechanism According to the dashboard, each trade carries a 1% fee, with 0.6% allocated to liquidity and 0.4% going to the Montra protocol. The creator currently receives 0% under the displayed fee configuration If the team activates buybacks as planned, 70% of protocol fees will be used to buy back and burn $MONTRA Under the current structure, that would represent approximately 0.28% of eligible trading volume. For example, if the platform generates $10M in volume subject to the same fee structure, the theoretical buyback amount would be around $28K I think this is the mechanism worth watching over the longer term because it could directly connect trading activity on the launchpad with actual demand for the token. However, buybacks haven't been activated yet, and there's still no confirmed timeline Another important detail is that the dashboard currently shows 961,002 KNTQ in total recorded fees, with the creator's share accounting for most of that amount I don't think the entire figure should be interpreted as Montra's revenue or funds available for buybacks, since only 61,280 KNTQ is actually recorded as the protocol's share As for liquidity, the project states that launch liquidity is permanently locked. Outside liquidity currently accounts for approximately 6.93% of matched trading activity, across 43 external LP positions Previously, I recorded outside liquidity at 53.94% with 72 positions, so this is a pretty significant change However, this metric reflects the share of trading activity handled by outside liquidity, not necessarily the percentage of total liquidity value sitting in the pool In my view, participation from external LPs can support trading activity, but it's still important to monitor whether those positions get withdrawn or adjusted when volume starts declining Regarding the token structure, $MONTRA uses a standard ERC-20 contract without mint, pause, or transfer-fee functionality. The initial 99% anti-snipe fee during the first five minutes has also ended These features help reduce certain technical risks, but they don't mean the token is immune to selling pressure from large holders Looking at the chart, $MONTRA quickly climbed above a $6M market cap before correcting toward $4M and recovering to around $5.3M If we get another deeper correction, I'll be watching the $3–3.5M market cap range, while paying close attention to volume and holder retention That's simply an area where I'd reassess the setup, not a confirmed support level At current levels, I'm still not interested in chasing after such an aggressive move, especially when the token is too new to have established a reliable accumulation range 4. So, can $MONTRA actually lead the next wave on Elysium? I think $MONTRA currently has one of the strongest narratives on Elysium, but it's still too early to call it the main runner of the entire ecosystem Montra has a working product, users, trading activity, an airdrop program, and a planned buyback mechanism. These are all advantages that many ordinary memecoins simply don't have However, those advantages will only matter if the team keeps building, maintains market share, and eventually converts launchpad trading volume into real token demand In the short term, $MONTRA could absolutely continue moving higher thanks to FOMO and attention. But if those are the only things driving the price, I don't think the momentum will be easy to sustain What I really want to see over the next few days is Montra maintaining trading volume after the launch hype settles, producing stronger runners, and providing concrete updates on the buyback mechanism If those things happen, I'd become much more bullish on $MONTRA For now, I'd rather wait for the FOMO to cool down than chase the pump Elysium needs a strong runner to bring attention back to the broader ecosystem. $MONTRA has a chance to fill that role, but whether it can actually pull it off is something the market still needs to prove 0x063f7cc5339f92a5fd7baf3d22233044fda1f327

✅ #Elysium 印钞机继续运行 本金不到1000U，2个小时净收益 💰233U 因为 $Montra 用的是 $kntq 底池 所有手续费最终流向了 kntq 底池 https://t.co/hjSgYdMf0a